Debugger prototype for Ruby

[osiewicz]

This is a prototype implementation of Ruby debugger implementation, based on existing impl in core Zed. Input is most welcome on what it looks like and all that jazz.
This is based on unreleased version of zed-extension-api.

[vitallium]

@osiewicz yes! Awesome, thank you! I can finalize it if you don’t mind. Do you have a release date for the new version of the extension_api crate?

[osiewicz]

Yep, feel free to deal with this branch as you see fit. I believe we're gonna cut a new version sometime next week. For local development you can probably get by with a patch on extension_api version.

[vitallium]

Yep, feel free to deal with this branch as you see fit. I believe we're gonna cut a new version sometime next week. For local development you can probably get by with a patch on extension_api version.

Got it, thanks! I think we should apply the same logic as we did in #37: check the bundle first, then PATH, and fall back to the extension's gem.

[joeldrapper]

I got access to the debugger beta and experimented with the existing Ruby adapter (not the one in this PR). A few issues came up.

First, it doesn’t appear to be using the correct version of Ruby. Even though a cwd is provided, the gem install tries to use the system Ruby (2.6) instead of the local Ruby managed by mise.

I haven’t got past this first issue but looking at the code, I believe it would attempt to run rdbg on this system Ruby too. But even if it changed to the configured cwd directory, it should first try bundle exec rdbg before rdbg because that will use the project’s bundled version of the debug gem.

Finally, it looks like the program command the UI generates is incorrect. I entered bundle exec qt and it produced "$ZED_WORKTREE_ROOT/bundle". This executable doesn’t exist. It needs to just run bundle from the working directory, or if it needs a path, needs to get that by running which bundle from the working directory.

[vitallium]

Thank you! ❤️

[andyw8]

I noticed that both Ruby and RDBG are listed in the debugger dropdown:

[P1n3appl3]

@vitallium I'd love to bump the extension version so it shows up when you filter by "DAP" on https://zed.dev/extensions. Would you prefer to put out a new minor release or should I just update the submodule to point at HEAD?