Normative change to SC 2.2.2 - replace "information" with "content", rewrite note 3#4920
Open
patrickhlauke wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
Open
Normative change to SC 2.2.2 - replace "information" with "content", rewrite note 3#4920patrickhlauke wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
patrickhlauke wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
…rewrite note 3 Closes #3478
patrickhlauke
added
ErratumRaised
✅ Deploy Preview for wcag2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is confusion relating to why the SC uses "information" rather than "content". While there may have been discussions back in the day when this was first drafted (possibly to make a distinction between "decorative" and "non-decorative" content?), the notes and understanding don't bear out this interpretation. Also, logically - if one of the primary aims of the SC is to help users that are distracted/confused by moving/auto-updating content that happens in parallel to other content ... it makes no difference whether that moving/updating stuff is "decorative" or "non-decorative".
In addition, Note 3 is currently almost unreadable (and grammatically wrong at the end as well: "and in many situations could be misleading to do so"?)
This PR proposed a normative change to the SC text itself and Note 3
Closes #3478