Skip to content

Conversation

@Cofson
Copy link
Contributor

@Cofson Cofson commented Nov 28, 2025

No description provided.

@Cofson Cofson requested a review from fbarbu15 November 28, 2025 01:44
@felicio felicio changed the title Commitments proposal Q1 2026 RFC Commitments proposal Q1 2026 Dec 1, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@fbarbu15 fbarbu15 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the proposal. Left some comments but they are not final
I will have a session with Ksr to go through this and then I will come back with the final comments

support the process of auditing raw, draft, mature selected RFCs.

This commitment covers this process for the following Codex RFCs:
block exchange, Erasure coding, Proving system
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can list code RFC that are not merged yet


## Description

This commitment supports the process of the choosing which raw RFCs,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can say that we need to drive the merging of open PRs and also refine raw RFC into more mature ones


## Task List

### WIP
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can have a task to merge open PRs
Another one to refine raw RFC (maybe broken down in one task/RFC)
Also a task would be to do workshops to enable Codex team to write better RFCs

- owner: cofson
- status: not started
- start-date: 2026/01/01
- end-date: 2025/01/01
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

end date is wrong

@fbarbu15
Copy link
Collaborator

fbarbu15 commented Dec 8, 2025

@Cofson
I've discussed with Ksr and we would need also an annoncoms commitment for the Annonimus Communications (new Logos team led by Hanno) specs.
Please add that as well and we will clarify more with Hanno once things settle down
See example of DST commitment

Cofson and others added 3 commits December 8, 2025 12:29
@Cofson Cofson requested a review from fbarbu15 December 8, 2025 11:53
@Cofson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cofson commented Dec 8, 2025

@Cofson I've discussed with Ksr and we would need also an annoncoms commitment for the Annonimus Communications (new Logos team led by Hanno) specs. Please add that as well and we will clarify more with Hanno once things settle down See example of DST commitment

Added the Anoncomms commitment, slightly differently from the DST one you linked. I added the space for new tasks and new RFCs and took example from your feedback on Codex commitment and included it here as well (same for Nomos). Let me know if it should be different.

- owner: cofson
- status: not started
- start-date: 2026/01/01
- end-date: 2026/04/30
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

last date of the quarter is 2026/03/31


#### Deliverables
- New RFCs (WIP)
### Merge Open PRs
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this shouldn't be here, we don't have open PRs in anon comms

is as brief as possible.

Current pipeline:
- Message Formatting: https://github.com/vacp2p/rfc-index/pull/219
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since some of those things are already done, we don't need Q1 tasks for them. Ex: Proof of quota
We have task for it but PR already exists and it just needs to be merged

- Answered to feedback
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants