Use error variable for non-item element in sequence#364
Use error variable for non-item element in sequence#364google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Replaced log.Println and ad-hoc error formatting with a new exported error variable ErrorExpectedSequenceItem. This improves error handling consistency and allows callers to programmatically check for this specific error condition.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. |
Introduced
ErrorExpectedSequenceItemerror variable inread.goand updatedreadSequenceto use it instead oflog.Printlnandfmt.Errorfstring. Verified with a test case and existing tests.PR created automatically by Jules for task 15915936084071351814 started by @suyashkumar