docs: Add Fedora 44 release notes#6966
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request updates the project's release notes documentation by incorporating a new section for Fedora 44. It integrates significant changes, such as the new Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request consolidates individual release note files for Fedora 44 into the main release-notes.rst document. The changes are well-structured. I have a couple of minor suggestions to improve the clarity and formatting of the newly added section.
docs/release-notes/release-notes.rst
Outdated
| Changes in the graphical interface | ||
| ---------------------------------- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks valid to me (consistent with older RNs). No empty sections.
rvykydal
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think the gemini-code-assist's review comments are valid, especially the one with empty section. Other than that LGTM.
28580f6 to
b33f708
Compare
|
/kickstart-tests --waive docs |
No description provided.