Skip to content

Convert javadoc publishing workflow to reusable workflow using workfl…#481

Open
satyamyadav979 wants to merge 1 commit intooss-slu:developfrom
satyamyadav979:satyamyadav979-patch-3
Open

Convert javadoc publishing workflow to reusable workflow using workfl…#481
satyamyadav979 wants to merge 1 commit intooss-slu:developfrom
satyamyadav979:satyamyadav979-patch-3

Conversation

@satyamyadav979
Copy link

…ow_call

Replaced the push trigger in javadoc-gh-pages.yml with workflow_call to make the workflow reusable.

This change allows the workflow to be invoked from a master orchestration workflow and ensures controlled execution order when combined with other documentation publishing workflows.

Pull Request Summary

Closes #xxx

A brief description/summary of your PR. What does it add, and why is it necessary? Does this new feature solve any problems or bugs? How was it tested — automated or manual software tests, physical hardware tests, or some other method or combination of testing techniques?

PR Checklist

  • Tests pass
  • Any related documentation has been updated, if necessary

Detailed Description

A more detailed description and any additional information.

…ow_call

Replaced the push trigger in javadoc-gh-pages.yml with workflow_call to make the workflow reusable.

This change allows the workflow to be invoked from a master orchestration workflow and ensures controlled execution order when combined with other documentation publishing workflows.

Signed-off-by: satyamyadav979 <145156185+satyamyadav979@users.noreply.github.com>
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants