SURF-449 Add documentation for GQL FOR as alternate syntax for UNWIND#1503
Merged
neo-harshg merged 1 commit intodevfrom Mar 31, 2026
Merged
SURF-449 Add documentation for GQL FOR as alternate syntax for UNWIND#1503neo-harshg merged 1 commit intodevfrom
neo-harshg merged 1 commit intodevfrom
Conversation
neo-harshg
force-pushed
the
SURF-449
branch
3 times, most recently
from
3645789 to
97a7577
Compare
rsill-neo4j
reviewed
Mar 24, 2026
modules/ROOT/pages/appendix/gql-conformance/analogous-cypher.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/ROOT/pages/appendix/gql-conformance/analogous-cypher.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/ROOT/pages/appendix/gql-conformance/supported-optional.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/ROOT/pages/deprecations-additions-removals-compatibility.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
neo-harshg
force-pushed
the
SURF-449
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f6abdb9 to
7d68596
Compare
rsill-neo4j
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2026
Contributor
rsill-neo4j
left a comment
rsill-neo4j
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
added a small commit + approval
can someone from the cypher team review as well?
hvub
previously requested changes
Mar 27, 2026
Contributor
hvub
left a comment
hvub
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Various suggestions around
- consistency with existing content
- very specifically more consistency between the FOR and the UNWIND page
- timeless wording
- some terminology
Thanks.
modules/ROOT/pages/deprecations-additions-removals-compatibility.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/ROOT/pages/deprecations-additions-removals-compatibility.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
modules/ROOT/pages/appendix/gql-conformance/supported-optional.adoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
neo-harshg
force-pushed
the
SURF-449
branch
2 times, most recently
from
6e47f76 to
6ab05c7
Compare
neo-harshg
changed the title
gem-neo4j
requested changes
Mar 30, 2026
Collaborator
|
Thanks for the documentation updates. The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it. |
gem-neo4j
dismissed
hvub’s stale review
Everything is fixed, Hannes is now on vacation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://linear.app/neo4j/issue/SURF-449/gql-compliance-for-as-replacement-for-unwind-gq10