Conversation
Signed-off-by: Guillaume W. Bres <guillaume.bressaix@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume W. Bres <guillaume.bressaix@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume W. Bres <guillaume.bressaix@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume W. Bres <guillaume.bressaix@gmail.com>
|
now I understand things "much better", GNSS (GPS and alike) use a modified (more realistic) This allows to fit the use case of orbiting Earth precisely. @ChristopherRabotin, while ANISE applies to all Orbits in theory, it seems like only an adapted model would provide precise solutions. Yet you have used ANISE with low/medium earth orbits. Do you have a notion of how "far" from truth these solutions are ? Do you think it could have value to introduce a new Orbit constructor, that would be ::from_keplerian augmented with harmonic corrections ? Side note, starting from this patch, you will find an API that is much similar to ANISE, for example I renamed many fields to match ANISE, for example, Side note (b), I will provide Glonass and SBAS (GEO) integration method with this patch, the ANISE bridge still applies, so it will provide an interesting method to move to ANISE from a geostationnary object |
|
I am not very familiar with the concept of harmonic corrections to Keplerian elements. Is it related to mean orbital elements, which smooth out the variations in the Keplerian elements? The orbit structure in ANISE represents a unique point in space and time so I'm not inclined to add parameters to that constructor, however if there is a specific mean orbital element theory you want to initialize with, we can do that. |
Signed-off-by: Guillaume W. Bres <guillaume.bressaix@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume W. Bres <guillaume.bressaix@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume W. Bres <guillaume.bressaix@gmail.com>
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.