[model] support more qwen3.5 models

[Jintao-Huang]

No description provided.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Jintao-Huang, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request expands the system's capabilities by integrating additional Qwen3.5 models. This enhancement allows users to leverage a broader range of Qwen3.5 variants, improving the platform's versatility and ensuring the documentation accurately reflects the newly supported models.

Highlights

• New Model Support: Added support for several new Qwen3.5 models, including 'Qwen3.5-27B', 'Qwen3.5-35B-A3B', 'Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Base', and 'Qwen3.5-122B-A10B'.
• Documentation Update: Updated the supported models documentation (both Chinese and English versions) to include the newly integrated Qwen3.5 models.
• Model Registration: Registered the new Qwen3.5 models within the qwen3_5_moe and qwen3_5 model types in the qwen.py configuration.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog

• docs/source/Instruction/Supported-models-and-datasets.md
  • Added entries for Qwen3.5-27B, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Base, and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.
• docs/source_en/Instruction/Supported-models-and-datasets.md
  • Added entries for Qwen3.5-27B, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Base, and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.
• swift/model/models/qwen.py
  • Registered 'Qwen/Qwen3.5-35B-A3B', 'Qwen/Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Base', and 'Qwen/Qwen3.5-122B-A10B' under MLLMModelType.qwen3_5_moe.
  • Registered 'Qwen/Qwen3.5-27B' under MLLMModelType.qwen3_5.

Activity

• No specific activity (comments, reviews, or progress updates) has been recorded for this pull request yet.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds support for several new Qwen3.5 models. The changes include registering these models in swift/model/models/qwen.py and updating the corresponding documentation in both English and Chinese. The model registrations and documentation updates are consistent and appear correct. I have reviewed the changes and found no issues.