Skip to content

Removed the boskos calls from the prow job definition #36208

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2026
Merged

Removed the boskos calls from the prow job definition #36208

k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2026
+20 −106

Conversation

@Ananya-kumari
Copy link
Contributor

@Ananya-kumari Ananya-kumari commented Jan 12, 2026 •
edited
Loading

  • Removed boskos env variables
  • Removed the gingko installation
  • Removed the boskos calls
  • Modified CLUSTER_NAME details for conformance and e2e-node jobs.

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jan 12, 2026 •
edited
Loading

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: Ananya-kumari / name: Ananya Kumari (61166ee)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 12, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Jan 12, 2026

Hi @Ananya-kumari. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/jobs sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Jan 12, 2026
@Ananya-kumari Ananya-kumari changed the title Remove the boskos calls from the prow job definition Removed the boskos calls from the prow job definition Jan 12, 2026
@Rajalakshmi-Girish
Copy link
Contributor

Rajalakshmi-Girish commented Jan 12, 2026

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 12, 2026
@Ananya-kumari Ananya-kumari marked this pull request as draft January 12, 2026 12:45
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 12, 2026
@Ananya-kumari Ananya-kumari marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2026 05:31
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 13, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from mkumatag January 13, 2026 05:31
@Ananya-kumari
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ananya-kumari commented Jan 13, 2026

/test pull-test-infra-verify-lint

@Ananya-kumari Ananya-kumari marked this pull request as draft January 13, 2026 05:57
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 13, 2026
@Ananya-kumari Ananya-kumari force-pushed the update-jobs branch 3 times, most recently from e4fd9f2 to 92bb8f0 Compare January 13, 2026 06:58
@Ananya-kumari Ananya-kumari marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2026 06:59
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 13, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from kishen-v January 13, 2026 06:59
@Ananya-kumari Ananya-kumari marked this pull request as draft January 13, 2026 08:06
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 13, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 20, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 27, 2026
@Ananya-kumari Ananya-kumari marked this pull request as ready for review January 27, 2026 08:04
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 27, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 27, 2026
@Ananya-kumari Ananya-kumari force-pushed the update-jobs branch 3 times, most recently from 1fa00cb to f4b06f2 Compare January 27, 2026 11:58
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 27, 2026
@Rajalakshmi-Girish
Copy link
Contributor

Rajalakshmi-Girish commented Feb 4, 2026

@upodroid Can you please relook this? Ananya seems to have implemented your comments.

upodroid
upodroid approved these changes Feb 5, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@upodroid upodroid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 5, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Feb 5, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ananya-kumari, upodroid

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 5, 2026
@upodroid upodroid mentioned this pull request Feb 5, 2026
Open
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 77621c5 into kubernetes:master Feb 5, 2026
6 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

k8s-ci-robot commented Feb 5, 2026

@Ananya-kumari: Updated the job-config configmap in namespace default at cluster test-infra-trusted using the following files:

  • key cloud-provider-ibmcloud-ppc64le-periodics.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/cloud-provider-ibmcloud/cloud-provider-ibmcloud-ppc64le-periodics.yaml
Details

In response to this:

  • Removed boskos env variables
  • Removed the gingko installation
  • Removed the boskos calls
  • Modified CLUSTER_NAME details for conformance and e2e-node jobs.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@Rajalakshmi-Girish Rajalakshmi-Girish mentioned this pull request Feb 6, 2026
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@upodroid upodroid upodroid approved these changes

@Prajyot-Parab Prajyot-Parab Awaiting requested review from Prajyot-Parab

@Rajalakshmi-Girish Rajalakshmi-Girish Awaiting requested review from Rajalakshmi-Girish

@mkumatag mkumatag Awaiting requested review from mkumatag

@kishen-v kishen-v Awaiting requested review from kishen-v

Assignees

@upodroid upodroid

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/jobs cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@Ananya-kumari @k8s-ci-robot @Rajalakshmi-Girish @upodroid