Feature/uv project mgmt

[sherlockhommel]

Hi all,

in this PR, I did exclusively work on the "outer form" of pya:

1. I changed the project management to use uv uniformly. This entails managing most of the tools from a pyproject.toml and enforces the creation of a uv.lock file that guarantees a synced setup for all devs (except from portaudio installation - maybe we can find a solution for that as well).
2. I added pre-commit hooks (mostly ruff) and went through a lot of small issues with ruffs standards. This is making up the bulk of the changes
3. The sphinx setup for the documentation did not work anymore (some version conflicts in newer package versions) and I changed that from autoapi to autodoc and auto summary
4. I also updated the tox setup and GitHub workflows to work fine with uv. The main pya-ci.yaml workflow should now execute matrix testing for Windows, MacOS and Ubuntu

In general, these changes only affect an active development setup. End-Users still use the normal installation from pypi (via pip, conda, ...).

Since these are mostly maintenance-related changes, I do not think you need to review these in detail - consider invitations for review more as an FYI :)

Also, this branch will probably have a few more changes before merging, definitely:

• add all contributors in documentation and pyproject.toml
• add description of developer setup, running tests, building documentation etc with uv in /dev

Best Greetings and thanks for having a view,

Fabian

[thomas-hermann]

I skimmed over the changes: wow, it's a lot. As you say too much to review in detail.
My conclusion is: looks good, please go ahead .

[coveralls]

Coverage is 71.902% — feature/uv-project-mgmt into develop. No base build found for develop.

[wiccy46]

Hi. Thanks for the effort. But I must say, this is impossible to review a 8k+ line. I am sorry, but I can't do it. Not sure if many can.

I would suggest two paths forward:

1. Just merge it without my involvement.
2. Break it into smaller chunks and iterative PRs. PR should be as small as possible to complete per feature.

I am fine with either option.

[thomas-hermann]

Thanks, Jiajun. Then let's proceed! As this PR is about project management it won't touch active code apart from formatting, so merging should be OK. Next step then will be to bring in the changes from the feature-agen branch.