Skip to content

Exclude development script#114

Open
weiznich wants to merge 1 commit intohawkw:mainfrom
GiGainfosystems:exclude_scripts
Open

Exclude development script#114
weiznich wants to merge 1 commit intohawkw:mainfrom
GiGainfosystems:exclude_scripts

Conversation

@weiznich
Copy link
Copy Markdown

During a dependency review we noticed that the sharded-slab crate includes a development script. These development script shouldn't be there as they might, at some point become problematic. As of now they prevent any downstream user from enabling the [bans.build.interpreted] option of cargo deny.

I opted for using an explicit include list instead of an exclude list to prevent these files from beeing included in the published packages to make sure that everything that's included is an conscious choice.

During a dependency review we noticed that the sharded-slab crate includes a development script. These development script shouldn't be there as they might, at some point become problematic. As of now they prevent any downstream user from enabling the `[bans.build.interpreted]` option of cargo deny.

I opted for using an explicit include list instead of an exclude list to prevent these files from beeing included in the published packages to make sure that everything that's included is an conscious choice.
@weiznich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

weiznich commented Feb 3, 2026

@ldm0 Any chance to get you looking at this PR?

@ldm0
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ldm0 commented Feb 3, 2026

@ldm0 Any chance to get you looking at this PR?

@weiznich I am not the maintainer of sharded-slab. cc @hawkw

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@hawkw hawkw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, this seems fine to me!

@hawkw hawkw enabled auto-merge (squash) February 4, 2026 02:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants