Weekly updated list of missing CVEs in nuclei templates official repository

Note This repository is 100% automated so there can be errors, but in general is pretty accurate. Go to section "How it works" to understand how data is collected.

Stats 📊

CVEs analyzed: 155134

CVEs missing: 47369

Dropdown by vuln type:

Type	Count	Data
XSS	22526	xss.txt
RCE	7232	rce.txt
SQL Injection	11955	sqli.txt
Local File Inclusion	367	lfi.txt
Server Side Request Forgery	350	ssrf.txt
Prototype Pollution	292	proto-pollution.txt
Request Smuggling	100	req-smuggling.txt
Open Redirect	438	open-redirect.txt
XML External Entity	468	xxe.txt
Path Traversal	3561	path-traversal.txt
Server Side Template Injection	80	ssti.txt

Dropdown by year:

Year	Count	Data
1999	5	1999.txt
2000	7	2000.txt
2001	17	2001.txt
2002	37	2002.txt
2003	39	2003.txt
2004	119	2004.txt
2005	382	2005.txt
2006	1094	2006.txt
2007	1063	2007.txt
2008	2018	2008.txt
2009	800	2009.txt
2010	703	2010.txt
2011	325	2011.txt
2012	572	2012.txt
2013	500	2013.txt
2014	966	2014.txt
2015	993	2015.txt
2016	613	2016.txt
2017	1479	2017.txt
2018	2112	2018.txt
2019	1837	2019.txt
2020	2586	2020.txt
2021	3025	2021.txt
2022	3896	2022.txt
2023	5618	2023.txt
2024	9519	2024.txt
2025	6874	2025.txt
2026	170	2026.txt

Why 🤔

• Bug bounty: the CVE templates in the official nuclei-templates repo are completely useless for bug bounty. This because everyone is using those templates looking for low hanging fruit. Build your own templates for new (and old!) CVEs, scan all the possible targets and don't forget to share them in the official nuclei-templates repo.
• General Security: Security people can write their own templates for missing CVEs and use them to secure products during pentests, vuln assessments, red team ops and so on... every user will benefit from these actions. If they are very good security people they'll share the templates in official nuclei-templates repo helping the whole infosec community.
• Stats & Data lover: I love data and statistics and I hope people like me will enjoy.

How it works 🖥️

Automated Logic:

for each cve in trickest/cve:
    if this cve not present in nuclei-templates:
        if it contains one of the words we are looking for:
            if it is a CVE suitable for nuclei:
                print it

• Which are the "words we are looking for"? reflected, rce, local file inclusion, server side request forgery, ssrf, remote code execution, remote command execution, command injection, code injection, ssti, template injection, lfi, xss, Cross-Site Scripting, Cross Site Scripting, SQL injection, Prototype pollution, XML External Entity, Request Smuggling, XXE, Open redirect, Path Traversal and Directory Traversal.

• This means the tracked vulnerability types are: XSS, RCE, SQL injection, Local File Inclusion, Server Side Request Forgery, Prototype Pollution, Request Smuggling, Open Redirect, XML Enternal Entity, Path Traversal and Server Side Template Injection; but new vuln types will be supported.

• Why there can be errors in categorizing CVEs? Because when grepping for these words there can be false positives, meaning that an XXE vulnerability can be categorized as RCE because e.g. it says "in certain situations can be escalated to rce".

• Why if I subtract the "CVEs missing" from the "CVEs analyzed" I don't get the exact official nuclei templates count? Because as said before the tracked vuln types are just 10 (the most famous ones), but a lot of other types are reported as well (and they will be supported).

• What does it mean a CVE is suitable for Nuclei? Basically a remote web or network vulnerability (e.g. a CVE on Android is not suitable).

Contributing 🛠

Just open an issue / pull request.

Thanks 💝

• @ProjectDiscovery
• @Trickest

License 📝

This repository is under MIT License.
edoardottt.com to contact me.