Merged
Conversation
0347003 to
660aa7a
Compare
113fb79 to
c6caf43
Compare
c6caf43 to
d6a6b35
Compare
- Write permissions on packages need to be specified - Latest libdbd-pg-perl version (3.18.0-1) has dep: libpq5 (>= 17~~) So, it fails when we want to install PG15 and PG16. Therefore we specify a version that includes all three (15, 16, 17) - Since we drop PG14, we need to specify Citus 11.1.0 as the oldest version supporting PG15 (in citus upgrade tests)
d6a6b35 to
d28f316
Compare
onurctirtir
approved these changes
May 22, 2025
naisila
added a commit
to citusdata/citus
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2025
Nontrivial bump because of the following PG15.3 commit 317aba70e postgres/postgres@317aba70e Previously, when views were converted to RTE_SUBQUERY the relid would be cleared in PG15. In this patch of PG15, relid is retained. Therefore, we add a check with the "relkind and rtekind" to identify the converted views in 15.13 Sister PR citusdata/the-process#164 Using dev image sha because I encountered the libpq symlink issue again with "-v219b87c"
naisila
added a commit
to citusdata/citus
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2025
Nontrivial bump because of the following PG15.3 commit 317aba70e postgres/postgres@317aba70e Previously, when views were converted to RTE_SUBQUERY the relid would be cleared in PG15. In this patch of PG15, relid is retained. Therefore, we add a check with the "relkind and rtekind" to identify the converted views in 15.13 Sister PR citusdata/the-process#164 Using dev image sha because I encountered the libpq symlink issue again with "-v219b87c"
naisila
added a commit
to citusdata/citus
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2025
Nontrivial bump because of the following PG15.3 commit 317aba70e postgres/postgres@317aba70e Previously, when views were converted to RTE_SUBQUERY the relid would be cleared in PG15. In this patch of PG15, relid is retained. Therefore, we add a check with the "relkind and rtekind" to identify the converted views in 15.13 Sister PR citusdata/the-process#164 Using dev image sha because I encountered the libpq symlink issue again with "-v219b87c"
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sister PR citusdata/citus#7986