Update sqlalchemy requirement from <2.1,>=1.4.48 to >=2.0.49,<2.1

[dependabot]

Updates the requirements on sqlalchemy to permit the latest version.

Release notes

Sourced from sqlalchemy's releases.

2.0.49

Released: April 3, 2026

orm

• [orm] [bug] Fixed issue where _orm.Session.get() would bypass the identity map and emit unnecessary SQL when with_for_update=False was passed, rather than treating it equivalently to the default of None. Pull request courtesy of Joshua Swanson.

  References: #13176

• [orm] [bug] Fixed issue where chained _orm.joinedload() options would not be applied correctly when the final relationship in the chain is declared on a base mapper and accessed through a subclass mapper in a _orm.with_polymorphic() query. The path registry now correctly computes the natural path when a property declared on a base class is accessed through a path containing a subclass mapper, ensuring the loader option can be located during query compilation.

  References: #13193

• [orm] [bug] [inheritance] Fixed issue where using _orm.Load.options() to apply a chained loader option such as _orm.joinedload() or _orm.selectinload() with _orm.PropComparator.of_type() for a polymorphic relationship would not generate the necessary clauses for the polymorphic subclasses. The polymorphic loading strategy is now correctly propagated when using a call such as joinedload(A.b).options(joinedload(B.c.of_type(poly))) to match the behavior of direct chaining e.g. joinedload(A.b).joinedload(B.c.of_type(poly)).

  References: #13202

• [orm] [bug] [inheritance] Fixed issue where using chained loader options such as _orm.selectinload() after _orm.joinedload() with _orm.PropComparator.of_type() for a polymorphic relationship would not properly apply the chained loader option. The loader option is now correctly applied when using a call such as joinedload(A.b.of_type(poly)).selectinload(poly.SubClass.c) to eagerly load related objects.

  References: #13209

typing

• [typing] [bug] Fixed a typing issue where the typed members of :data:.func would return the appropriate class of the same name, however this creates an issue for

... (truncated)

Commits

• See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[auvipy]

have to cross check before merge

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.45%. Comparing base (28c6032) to head (49f02ed).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2521   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.45%   82.45%           
=======================================
  Files          79       79           
  Lines       10150    10150           
  Branches     1167     1167           
=======================================
  Hits         8369     8369           
  Misses       1579     1579           
  Partials      202      202           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.