Closed
Conversation
…nto 2026_improve_fitting
JaGeo
commented
Jan 8, 2026
JaGeo
commented
Jan 8, 2026
JaGeo
commented
Jan 8, 2026
Collaborator
Author
|
I would like to merge this fast. However, my feeling is that it would be good to, in general, test the fitting modules systematically. Common use cases:
|
Collaborator
Author
|
For now, I will continue in #483 . This PR attempted to much by also restructuring the fitting module imports. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Unfortunately, the MACE fitting procedure was broken in the previous version. It only considered energies and forces. See #469 for more details on one of the issues.
This PR should fix the issue. As we haven't produced any production data with this fitting module, this is not an issue for us.