-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
Regularization in higher dimensions #354
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9ef6bfe
Regularization in higher dimensions
YuanbinLiu 92e6ece
Minor adjustment
YuanbinLiu 8021db8
Update tests/fitting/common/test_regularization.py
naik-aakash 2f16a1e
Update tests/fitting/common/test_regularization.py
naik-aakash 76c29c6
Update tests/fitting/common/test_regularization.py
naik-aakash bdb0ca5
Fix condition check
naik-aakash 0240b63
Unit test update
YuanbinLiu 2fd91e4
Unit test update
YuanbinLiu 618cd06
check package list
YuanbinLiu d195c19
Revert
YuanbinLiu a43624d
fix a bug
YuanbinLiu c3b1308
pre-commit auto-fixes
pre-commit-ci[bot] 6649fac
fix a lint issue
YuanbinLiu a8bddf0
Merge branch 'debug' of github.com:YuanbinLiu/autoplex_pub into debug
YuanbinLiu 9e309a7
Remove duplicate functions
YuanbinLiu 8692c35
Minor adjustment
YuanbinLiu File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we need this additional else condition? Wouldn't this fail if no calculator is attached to the atom's object? or it still works fine?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is because in the new version of ASE, if the energy label is "energy", it no longer supports reading from info, but instead uses get_potential_energy(). However, if the user specifies a different energy label, it will be read from info according to their setting.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh okay. Thanks did not know this was changed.