-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
[Bug](catalog) fix runtime filter partition pruning error with binary type #59564
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
|
run buildall |
FE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 31832 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 172938 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 27.09 s |
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 31389 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 173256 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 27.42 s |
BE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
BE Regression && UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
7223bb9 to
40f886f
Compare
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 31904 ms |
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 31765 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 173439 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 26.79 s |
FE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 31814 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 172372 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 26.94 s |
FE Regression Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
FE Regression Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
1 similar comment
FE Regression Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage |
morningman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
| return null; | ||
| } | ||
| return value.toString(); | ||
| case BINARY: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A corresponding case needs to be added for paimon.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
// binary type as partition key will cause issues in paimon, so skipping these tests
What problem does this PR solve?
Related PR: #53399
Problem Summary:
the serializePartitionValue function will return String value.
But the binary type use String with utf8 will be cause data corrupted, and it is not same with origin data.
Release note
None
Check List (For Author)
Test
Behavior changed:
Does this need documentation?
Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)