Skip to content

docs(specs): align with style guides#5930

Merged
Fluf22 merged 3 commits intomainfrom
specs/align-descriptions
Feb 6, 2026
Merged

docs(specs): align with style guides#5930
Fluf22 merged 3 commits intomainfrom
specs/align-descriptions

Conversation

@kai687
Copy link
Contributor

@kai687 kai687 commented Feb 5, 2026

🧭 What and Why

Align the description fields in all specs with our style guidelines.

🎟 JIRA Ticket:

Changes included:

  • Update to AGENTS.md to respect the documentation guidelines
  • Update to the documentation guidelines to make (agentic) edits (hopefully) more complete
  • Update to many description fields to better align with the guidelines for more clarity and consistency.

🧪 Test

@algolia-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

algolia-bot commented Feb 5, 2026

✔️ Code generated!

Name Link
🪓 Triggered by c4ce8a20631540e0a46c6d094c0deffca5973bf6
🍃 Generated commit 7a58bbacc872e5d9a668ea0513b17b0853264f52
🌲 Generated branch generated/specs/align-descriptions
📊 Benchmark results

Benchmarks performed on the method using a mock server, the results might not reflect the real-world performance.

Language Req/s
javascript 2364
go 2176
php 1870
csharp 1700
python 1381
java 1171
ruby 878
swift 635
scala 23

@kai687 kai687 changed the title doc(specs): align with style guides docs(specs): align with style guides Feb 5, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2026

@kai687 kai687 marked this pull request as ready for review February 5, 2026 14:00
@kai687 kai687 requested review from a team as code owners February 5, 2026 14:00
@kai687 kai687 requested review from Fluf22 and eric-zaharia February 5, 2026 14:00
Copy link
Collaborator

@Fluf22 Fluf22 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We really need to add a CI step that triggers a reviewing agent on the description and summary fields of the specs!
Btw, I see that a bot reacted to the PR desc 🤔

Image

@kai687
Copy link
Contributor Author

kai687 commented Feb 5, 2026

We really need to add a CI step that triggers a reviewing agent on the description and summary fields of the specs! Btw, I see that a bot reacted to the PR desc 🤔
Image

Part of the reason why I did this PR was to see how good AI review/edits are given the guidelines we provide in this repo in preparation to perhaps an automatic PR review.

@Fluf22
Copy link
Collaborator

Fluf22 commented Feb 5, 2026

We should have automatic PR review on our roadmap soon

@Fluf22 Fluf22 force-pushed the specs/align-descriptions branch from eea94cc to 664fd0a Compare February 6, 2026 07:49
@Fluf22 Fluf22 enabled auto-merge (squash) February 6, 2026 07:51
@Fluf22 Fluf22 merged commit 46be49a into main Feb 6, 2026
36 checks passed
@Fluf22 Fluf22 deleted the specs/align-descriptions branch February 6, 2026 08:08
algolia-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2026
Co-authored-by: Kai Welke <kai.welke@algolia.com>
algolia-bot added a commit to algolia/algoliasearch-client-csharp that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2026
algolia/api-clients-automation#5930

Co-authored-by: algolia-bot <accounts+algolia-api-client-bot@algolia.com>
Co-authored-by: Kai Welke <kai.welke@algolia.com>
algolia-bot added a commit to algolia/algoliasearch-client-dart that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2026
algolia/api-clients-automation#5930

Co-authored-by: algolia-bot <accounts+algolia-api-client-bot@algolia.com>
Co-authored-by: Kai Welke <kai.welke@algolia.com>
algolia-bot added a commit to algolia/algoliasearch-client-go that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2026
algolia/api-clients-automation#5930

Co-authored-by: algolia-bot <accounts+algolia-api-client-bot@algolia.com>
Co-authored-by: Kai Welke <kai.welke@algolia.com>
algolia-bot added a commit to algolia/algoliasearch-client-java that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2026
algolia/api-clients-automation#5930

Co-authored-by: algolia-bot <accounts+algolia-api-client-bot@algolia.com>
Co-authored-by: Kai Welke <kai.welke@algolia.com>
algolia-bot added a commit to algolia/algoliasearch-client-javascript that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2026
algolia/api-clients-automation#5930

Co-authored-by: algolia-bot <accounts+algolia-api-client-bot@algolia.com>
Co-authored-by: Kai Welke <kai.welke@algolia.com>
algolia-bot added a commit to algolia/algoliasearch-client-kotlin that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2026
algolia/api-clients-automation#5930

Co-authored-by: algolia-bot <accounts+algolia-api-client-bot@algolia.com>
Co-authored-by: Kai Welke <kai.welke@algolia.com>
algolia-bot added a commit to algolia/algoliasearch-client-php that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2026
algolia/api-clients-automation#5930

Co-authored-by: algolia-bot <accounts+algolia-api-client-bot@algolia.com>
Co-authored-by: Kai Welke <kai.welke@algolia.com>
algolia-bot added a commit to algolia/algoliasearch-client-python that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2026
algolia/api-clients-automation#5930

Co-authored-by: algolia-bot <accounts+algolia-api-client-bot@algolia.com>
Co-authored-by: Kai Welke <kai.welke@algolia.com>
algolia-bot added a commit to algolia/algoliasearch-client-ruby that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2026
algolia/api-clients-automation#5930

Co-authored-by: algolia-bot <accounts+algolia-api-client-bot@algolia.com>
Co-authored-by: Kai Welke <kai.welke@algolia.com>
algolia-bot added a commit to algolia/algoliasearch-client-scala that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2026
algolia/api-clients-automation#5930

Co-authored-by: algolia-bot <accounts+algolia-api-client-bot@algolia.com>
Co-authored-by: Kai Welke <kai.welke@algolia.com>
algolia-bot added a commit to algolia/algoliasearch-client-swift that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2026
algolia/api-clients-automation#5930

Co-authored-by: algolia-bot <accounts+algolia-api-client-bot@algolia.com>
Co-authored-by: Kai Welke <kai.welke@algolia.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants