feat: handle guardrail validation reason #415

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Open

apetraru-uipath wants to merge 1 commit into main from feat/guardrails_validate_response_simplification

+84 −41

Contributor

apetraru-uipath commented Jan 15, 2026

Handle Guardrail Validation Reason

Summary

Updated _create_validation_command to properly handle guardrail validation reason with strict typing.

Changes

Strict type annotation: Function parameter now uses GuardrailValidationResult type instead of untyped result
Parameter rename: Changed result to guardrail_result to avoid confusion with the result attribute
Simplified logic: Removed unnecessary fallback handling, now directly accesses guardrail_result.reason

Benefits

Type safety: Strict typing ensures correct usage and better IDE support
Clearer code: More descriptive parameter name and direct access to reason field
Proper handling: Validation reason is now properly extracted and passed to the command


          feat: handle guardrail validation reason

17abf59

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet