Added did ion deactivation endpoint.#646
Added did ion deactivation endpoint.#646andresuribe87 wants to merge 11 commits intoTBD54566975:mainfrom
Conversation
andresuribe87
requested review from
decentralgabe and
nitro-neal
as code owners
| summary: Updates a DID document. | ||
| tags: | ||
| - DecentralizedIdentityAPI | ||
| /v1/dids/{method}/{id}/deactivation: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this can be more restful as a delete to /v1/dids/{method}/{id}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We already have a that taken by SoftDelete
There was a problem hiding this comment.
hm, I see. awkward because we both need to handle the service's concept of deletion and the did methods
I'm inclined to merge the two...
Something lke -- if the DID method supports deactivation, the DELETE to /v1/dids/{method}/{id} does both delete and deactivation. If the DID method does not support deactivation, we just do a delete.
Reason being, it's more confusing to support both separately. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like that, will update.
| if storedDID.Deactivated { | ||
| return storedDID, nil | ||
| } | ||
| storedDID.Operations = append(storedDID.Operations, deactivateRequest) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this seems off - shouldn't the result be the processed deactivate request?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Which "result" are you referring to?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
my thought was that we should not rely on our internal source of truth, but have some operation to wait for an anchor and have that reflected as the result. but I'm thinking that's too complex. just need to make sure these properties are correct. (they look to be correct)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we're eventually going to need to communicate to devs that some new state hasn't been published. That said, I agree that it's too complex for now.
I made my best to ensure that all the properties were correct.
…e' into issue_340_deactivate
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #646 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 25.72% 26.06% +0.33%
==========================================
Files 56 57 +1
Lines 6254 6404 +150
==========================================
+ Hits 1609 1669 +60
- Misses 4369 4442 +73
- Partials 276 293 +17
|
3 participants
Overview
As part of #340, this PR adds support for deactivation. See the API documentation for more details.
Description
This PR involves a couple of changes so that we return resolution results.
How Has This Been Tested?
Unit tests.