Haskell

[heruka-urgyen]

Initial Haskell implementation.
Returns JSON, doesn't use any templates for client-side.
A common client-side app will be in a separate pull-request.

[bzz]

What do you think if we have this read from external source i.e env var or file, etc. rather then hard-coded? As this might be a security issue

[bzz]

Why do not we have this PR on top of #3 and not a master (so may be re-create it)?
Also may be it should start with 'initial haskell commit' and does not have anything metheor-related too (even if that's a deletion)

Do you have experience in interactive re-basing? It's super simple with git, but let me know if you need a hand here

[heruka-urgyen]

What do you think if we have this read from external source

Good idea.

Why do not we have this PR on top of #3

Sorry, my bad.
I'll try to rebase it.

[bzz]

Why do not we have this PR on top of #3

Sorry, my bad.
I'll try to rebase it.

Sometimes just re-creating a PR is enough and I think that the case here, just create new PR on top of #3
Reabse usually referees actually moving commits around and looks like 'initial haskel' is the first one here.. though now I'm not sure who's parent of 'haskel' branch in git