Conversation
|
|
schneidermic0
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @anne-hobbs for your contribution. 👍
In a first iteration I went only over the example file and added some suggestions/ideas/questions there.
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Schneider <micha.schneider@sap.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Schneider <micha.schneider@sap.com>
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
The lock mode in primaryTable -> lockMode can also be empty, so that nothing is selected. This should be also reflected in the AFF. This does not apply to secondaryTables->lockMode. |
ENQU can be active with initial lock mode -> how do we reflect this in AFF? |
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: abaplint[bot] <24845621+abaplint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
the annotation "! $values { @link zah_aff_enqu_v1.data:co_lock_modes } is not correct. Yes, the enums should be in the json schema. |
| "! Only conflict check exclusive lock, as with 'E' | ||
| conflict_check_exclusive TYPE ty_lock_mode VALUE 'V', | ||
| "! <p class="shorttext">Conflict check for shared lock only, as with 'S'</p> | ||
| "! CaConflict check for shared lock only, as with 'S' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@anne-hobbs We need to change the zero to big letter o for the lock mode text of 'R':
'R' Promote optimistic lock; transform from '0' to 'E'
'R' Promote optimistic lock; transform from 'O' to 'E'
The question regarding knowing what 'X' or 'R' or else is the same issue as in SAP GUI or ADT as before. So no need of change here.


No description provided.