Bring mopac syntax.json back with the other plugins and update style#32
Bring mopac syntax.json back with the other plugins and update style#32ghutchis merged 3 commits intoOpenChemistry:masterfrom
syntax.json back with the other plugins and update style#32Conversation
Signed-off-by: brockdyer03 <[email protected]>
|
Thanks for opening this pull request! Please check out our contributing guidelines and check for the automated tests. |
Signed-off-by: brockdyer03 <[email protected]>
syntax.json back with the other pluginssyntax.json back with the other plugins and update style
|
@nbehrnd Please give this a review and make sure I didn't mess up your work! |
|
@brockdyer03 Well
the top of the file's two versions (top pane new, bottom pane present version) the bottom of the two versions
I notice the Do you think this difference is relevant? If so, keep in mind I basically know about NWChem because it is listed as an output of Avogadro's generators. I understood the correct working the generators (including the syntax highlighting) only is most reliably checked by building a new Avogadro2 executable. Normally, this would call for a nightly built. Instead of waiting for such an artifact, with insight and resources, this equally could be achieved locally any time earlier, too. But it could help if the proposed change works well, as a probe prior to a merge. |
|
@brockdyer03 |
Signed-off-by: brockdyer03 <[email protected]>
|
I tried to use the |
|
One thing I'll think about is the "second line is a comment" syntax for MOPAC. Maybe something like |


Developer Certificate of Origin
Version 1.1
Copyright (C) 2004, 2006 The Linux Foundation and its contributors.
1 Letterman Drive
Suite D4700
San Francisco, CA, 94129
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
license document, but changing it is not allowed.
Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
have the right to submit it under the open source license
indicated in the file; or
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
in the file; or
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
it.
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
this project or the open source license(s) involved.