Skip to content

CompatHelper: bump compat for RecursiveArrayTools to 4, (keep existing compat)#291

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
compathelper/new_version/2026-04-02-00-49-09-846-02114810851
Open

CompatHelper: bump compat for RecursiveArrayTools to 4, (keep existing compat)#291
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
compathelper/new_version/2026-04-02-00-49-09-846-02114810851

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2026

This pull request changes the compat entry for the RecursiveArrayTools package from 3.27.2 to 3.27.2, 4.
This keeps the compat entries for earlier versions.

Note: I have not tested your package with this new compat entry.
It is your responsibility to make sure that your package tests pass before you merge this pull request.

@JoshuaLampert JoshuaLampert force-pushed the compathelper/new_version/2026-04-02-00-49-09-846-02114810851 branch from 5fff896 to 01712ff Compare April 2, 2026 00:49
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2026

Benchmark Results (Julia v1.10)

Time benchmarks
main df569c3... main / df569c3...
bbm_1d/bbm_1d_basic.jl - rhs!: 14.6 ± 0.47 μs 13.8 ± 0.34 μs 1.05 ± 0.043
bbm_1d/bbm_1d_fourier.jl - rhs!: 0.537 ± 0.013 ms 0.536 ± 0.013 ms 1 ± 0.034
bbm_bbm_1d/bbm_bbm_1d_basic_reflecting.jl - rhs!: 0.0815 ± 0.0004 ms 0.0812 ± 0.00029 ms 1 ± 0.0061
bbm_bbm_1d/bbm_bbm_1d_dg.jl - rhs!: 0.0348 ± 0.0027 ms 0.0349 ± 0.0026 ms 0.998 ± 0.11
bbm_bbm_1d/bbm_bbm_1d_relaxation.jl - rhs!: 27.3 ± 1.1 μs 27.6 ± 1.9 μs 0.989 ± 0.079
bbm_bbm_1d/bbm_bbm_1d_upwind_relaxation.jl - rhs!: 0.049 ± 0.0029 ms 0.0488 ± 0.0027 ms 1 ± 0.081
hyperbolic_serre_green_naghdi_1d/hyperbolic_serre_green_naghdi_dingemans.jl - rhs!: 4.25 ± 0.03 μs 4.28 ± 0.03 μs 0.993 ± 0.0099
kdv_1d/kdv_1d_basic.jl - rhs!: 1.42 ± 0.03 μs 1.43 ± 0.029 μs 0.992 ± 0.029
kdv_1d/kdv_1d_implicit.jl - rhs!: 1.4 ± 0.03 μs 1.67 ± 0.011 μs 0.839 ± 0.019
serre_green_naghdi_1d/serre_green_naghdi_well_balanced.jl - rhs!: 0.205 ± 0.014 ms 0.204 ± 0.014 ms 1 ± 0.096
svaerd_kalisch_1d/svaerd_kalisch_1d_dingemans_relaxation.jl - rhs!: 0.148 ± 0.0097 ms 0.149 ± 0.01 ms 0.998 ± 0.095
time_to_load 2.46 ± 0.021 s 2.45 ± 0.013 s 1 ± 0.01
Memory benchmarks
main df569c3... main / df569c3...
bbm_1d/bbm_1d_basic.jl - rhs!: 1 allocs: 4.12 kB 1 allocs: 4.12 kB 1
bbm_1d/bbm_1d_fourier.jl - rhs!: 1 allocs: 4.12 kB 1 allocs: 4.12 kB 1
bbm_bbm_1d/bbm_bbm_1d_basic_reflecting.jl - rhs!: 5 allocs: 1.17 kB 5 allocs: 1.17 kB 1
bbm_bbm_1d/bbm_bbm_1d_dg.jl - rhs!: 10 allocs: 8.62 kB 10 allocs: 8.62 kB 1
bbm_bbm_1d/bbm_bbm_1d_relaxation.jl - rhs!: 2 allocs: 8.25 kB 2 allocs: 8.25 kB 1
bbm_bbm_1d/bbm_bbm_1d_upwind_relaxation.jl - rhs!: 2 allocs: 8.25 kB 2 allocs: 8.25 kB 1
hyperbolic_serre_green_naghdi_1d/hyperbolic_serre_green_naghdi_dingemans.jl - rhs!: 0 allocs: 0 B 0 allocs: 0 B
kdv_1d/kdv_1d_basic.jl - rhs!: 0 allocs: 0 B 0 allocs: 0 B
kdv_1d/kdv_1d_implicit.jl - rhs!: 0 allocs: 0 B 0 allocs: 0 B
serre_green_naghdi_1d/serre_green_naghdi_well_balanced.jl - rhs!: 0.075 k allocs: 0.66 MB 0.075 k allocs: 0.66 MB 1
svaerd_kalisch_1d/svaerd_kalisch_1d_dingemans_relaxation.jl - rhs!: 0.042 k allocs: 0.315 MB 0.042 k allocs: 0.315 MB 1
time_to_load 0.153 k allocs: 14.5 kB 0.153 k allocs: 14.5 kB 1

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

coveralls commented Apr 2, 2026

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 23974323780

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 98.483%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 23973948849: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2532
Relevant Lines: 2571

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ranocha ranocha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants