Open
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
@thestinger What do you think about this PR? Should the CI aarch64 gcc switch to gcc-14? |
Contributor
Author
|
I have switched the aarch64 CI to gcc-14. If that is not desired, I can change it back. |
thestinger
force-pushed
the
main
branch
4 times, most recently
from
9d5802c to
074d47a
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It makes sense to me to implement the C++ align_val_t delete functions through free_aligned_sized, which is a C23 interface (#313). This PR changes the Makefile to target C23.