Update supported CPU/GPU targets for 2025.06#734
Merged
casparvl merged 8 commits intoEESSI:mainfrom Apr 14, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
casparvl
reviewed
Apr 14, 2026
casparvl
reviewed
Apr 14, 2026
Co-authored-by: Caspar van Leeuwen <[email protected]>
Collaborator
Author
|
I've replaced all the |
Collaborator
Author
casparvl
approved these changes
Apr 14, 2026
Collaborator
casparvl
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me. Thanks Bob, it's been a thorn in my side that our efforts on the 2025.06 GPU support weren't "visible" yet - now they are. And it looks a lot more attractive visually than it used to. Nice!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



CPU overview:
GPU overview:
Not completely happy with this one yet. Already disabled the TOC to get more space, but there's quite a lot of information in the table. Maybe we should shorten the CPU names here or stick to the same ones as on the CPU page (i.e.
x86_64/amd/zen5instead of having different columns)?But, anyway, I'd say it's already an improvement (currently there's no info about 2025.06 at all), so we can further improve it in follow-up PRs.