Conversation
| ], | ||
| "hasPart": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "@id": "data/annotations/" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(nit) but i'm intending to shorten these to just be the id as a string, rather than id objects. I.e:
"has_part": [
"data/annotations/",
"data/images/confocal/",
...
]
same for any situation with an id-only refernce.
| "@type": "bia:Contributor", | ||
| "display_name": "Giulia Paci", | ||
| "@id": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0565-4356", | ||
| "role": "data acquisition, data curator", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i think this should be a list of strings
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good catch! will fix this
| "associated_specimen_image_acquisition_protocol": [ | ||
| "Confocal imaging" | ||
| ], | ||
| "genotype": "; ubiCAAX-GFP/+ ; neuPH-RFP/+" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I know this isn't the main aim of this example, but the genotype property would need to be defined in this document.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think I did, just a few lines below:
{
"@id": "_:genotype",
"@type": "rdf:Property",
"name": "genotype",
"description": "Genotype of the line imaged"
},
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh sorry i missed that in the datatypes - yep that's fine!
| "associated_bio_sample": [ | ||
| "Wing disk" | ||
| ], | ||
| "associated_specimen_imaging_preparation_protocol": [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Currently moving these to just be on the dataset, rather than association & remove the Association class - but again, i don't think its relevant for the aims of this PR.
2 participants
Added a new example for a dataset that contains annotations (segmentation masks): https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/bioimages/studies/S-BIAD843
The main focus here was getting segmentations linked to their parent images.