Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency python-dateutil to v2.9.0#14

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/python-dateutil-2.x-lockfile
Open

chore(deps): update dependency python-dateutil to v2.9.0#14
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/python-dateutil-2.x-lockfile

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 16, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
python-dateutil 2.8.22.9.0 age confidence

Release Notes

dateutil/dateutil (python-dateutil)

v2.9.0

Compare Source

Version 2.9.0 (2024-02-29)
Data updates
  • Updated tzdata version to 2024a. (gh pr #​1342)
Features
  • Made all dateutil submodules lazily imported using PEP 562. On Python 3.7+, things like import dateutil; dateutil.tz.gettz("America/New_York") will now work without explicitly importing dateutil.tz, with the import occurring behind the scenes on first use. The old behavior remains on Python 3.6 and earlier. Fixed by Orson Adams. (gh issue #​771, gh pr #​1007)
Bugfixes
  • Removed a call to datetime.utcfromtimestamp, which is deprecated as of Python 3.12. Reported by Hugo van Kemenade (gh pr #​1284), fixed by Thomas Grainger (gh pr #​1285).
Documentation changes
  • Added note into docs and tests where relativedelta would return last day of the month only if the same day on a different month resolves to a date that doesn't exist. Reported by @​hawkEye-01 (gh issue #​1167). Fixed by @​Mifrill (gh pr #​1168)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested review from a team as code owners February 16, 2026 22:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants

Comments