Revisit brewfile management

[castrojo]

I ripped out the k8s and ai brewfiles from bluefin today. These are causing issues, we need to set up the linter.

@hanthor thinks that we don't even need to rpm these, I would prefer that approach, like how we do with the flatpak lists.

[castrojo]

Actually lol, these are command line apps. There's no reason for them to be separate between images, we always want the CLIs to be consistent anyway. It's all userspace stuff.

Did we design it this way on purpose or something? Feels like we should have done it that way since the beginning. 😆

[hanthor]

Yeah, and people can uninstall just like flatpaks.

If people really don't like how we do things we can make an option to wipe all homebrew packages and restart. But I think we should force our opinions on people

[inffy]

Easiest way would be to just have general files for these, these separate files are propably some "old tech debt"

So just generate general brewfiles for -ai,-cli and kubernetes stuff.

[castrojo]

I think a great test case here is we can move all the config for bluefin-cli into a brew as a bling-cli.

Then all the bling management is actually managed. Then we just design have each image have a config in there. This would give us centralized management and it will be way easier than doing this in the packages repo or copy and pasting between repos.