Update Discourse data data [skip ci]

Author: precice-bot

assets/data/faq.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "source": "preCICE Discourse (FAQ)",
-  "generated_at": "2026-03-17T07:00:21.928610",
+  "generated_at": "2026-03-18T06:58:02.294794",
   "topics": [
     {
       "id": 44,
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-be-used-for-volume-coupling/27",
       "created_at": "2019-09-23T20:55:55.190Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2025-08-11T13:12:45.035Z",
-      "views": 3259,
+      "views": 3260,
       "posts_count": 10,
       "like_count": 2,
       "excerpt": "I read that you do surface coupling?\nDo you support volume coupling too?"
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/restarting-coupled-fsi-simulation-with-precice/117",
       "created_at": "2019-12-06T09:10:16.329Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2024-07-03T15:56:51.883Z",
-      "views": 2348,
+      "views": 2349,
       "posts_count": 11,
       "like_count": 5,
       "excerpt": "Dear all,\nI am trying to validate my fluid and structure mesh for the FSI1 case of cylinder-flap test. As the refinement of the fluid and structure mesh increases, it is difficult for implicit FSI coupling to converge. Therefore, my idea is to use a \u2026"
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-be-used-with-gpus-or-other-accelerator-cards/822",
       "created_at": "2021-12-08T11:09:10.769Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2023-05-10T15:52:06.292Z",
-      "views": 908,
+      "views": 909,
       "posts_count": 6,
       "like_count": 4,
       "excerpt": "My target system features GPUs or other accelerator cards.\nCan preCICE use them to accelerate the simulation?"
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/how-do-i-cite-precice/32",
       "created_at": "2019-09-23T21:04:21.131Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2023-05-10T14:05:11.297Z",
-      "views": 810,
+      "views": 811,
       "posts_count": 4,
       "like_count": 0,
       "excerpt": "I used preCICE in my research and want to cite it.\nWhat citation should I use?"
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/how-can-i-restart-a-coupled-simulation/675",
       "created_at": "2021-07-29T13:29:19.539Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2021-07-29T13:31:08.839Z",
-      "views": 1500,
+      "views": 1502,
       "posts_count": 3,
       "like_count": 3,
       "excerpt": "Common question: \u201cMy simulation crashed after hours of running, but my solvers already has stored restart files. Do I need to do anything special in preCICE?\u201d"
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
       "url": "https://precice.discourse.group/t/help-the-participants-are-not-finding-each-other/646",
       "created_at": "2021-06-30T19:58:06.063Z",
       "last_posted_at": "2021-07-03T19:59:48.473Z",
-      "views": 2466,
+      "views": 2468,
       "posts_count": 4,
       "like_count": 1,
       "excerpt": "A possible situation, without an error: one or both/multiple participants display the message\nSetting up master communication to coupling partner/s\n\nand nothing happens, even though this step should complete instantaneously."
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@
       "views": 503,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Or: Can preCICE interpolate between an arbitrary / unstructured mesh and a regular / structured mesh?"
     },
     {
       "id": 55,
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
       "views": 474,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "I always hear that monolithic coupling is the only way to go, as partitioned coupling introduces error. Is this correct?"
     },
     {
       "id": 54,
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
       "views": 515,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Can the individual solvers run on two different platforms on two different machines in/out of a network?"
     },
     {
       "id": 52,
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@
       "views": 516,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Which code is executing the coupling iterations given that preCICE does not really have a centralized engine to orchestrate the simulation?"
     },
     {
       "id": 26,
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
       "views": 585,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "How do you test preCICE and its official adapters?\nCan I trust you?"
     },
     {
       "id": 50,
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@
       "views": 848,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "There are multiple OpenFOAM \u201cvariants\u201d, including openfoam.com, openfoam.org, and the early fork foam-extend. Which versions of them are compatible?"
     },
     {
       "id": 43,
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@
       "views": 1007,
       "posts_count": 3,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Marta asked on the mailing list (March 28, 2019)\n\nI\u2019m using preCICE to couple two codes: the lattice Boltzmann code LUMIS and OpenFOAM. LUMIS has a time step 10 times smaller than OpenFOAM so during the coupling LUMIS subcycles before exchanging data\u2026"
     },
     {
       "id": 29,
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@
       "views": 816,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "My solver offers adaptive mesh refinement.\nCan I use this with preCICE?"
     },
     {
       "id": 38,
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@
       "views": 1130,
       "posts_count": 3,
       "like_count": 1,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "A preCICE developer told me to try a \u201cPR\u201d (Pull Request). What is this and how do I try it?"
     },
     {
       "id": 42,
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@
       "views": 735,
       "posts_count": 7,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "We had a good discussion with Satish on the mailing list about the re-partitioning process and the connection to parallel data mapping in preCICE.\nSatish asked (July 24, 2019):\n\nIt seems to me that mappings can occur in parallel in preCICE. Is that c\u2026"
     },
     {
       "id": 41,
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@
       "views": 745,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 2,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "Nikrouz asked on the mailing list (Sep 13, 2019):\n\nI am going to use OpenFoam-CalculiX for FSI simulations.\nAt this time, I am have technical question for preparing preCICE config file. The case I am going to run has very large deformations. Fortunat\u2026"
     },
     {
       "id": 36,
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@
       "views": 643,
       "posts_count": 2,
       "like_count": 0,
-      "excerpt": ""
+      "excerpt": "The OpenFOAM adapter has the form of an OpenFOAM function object. This mechanism is commonly used only for post-processing, so a reasonable question is:\n\nDoes the OpenFOAM adapter also take care of the checkpointing? In other words, can a function ob\u2026"
     }
   ]
 }

assets/data/news.json

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 {
-  "generated_at": "2026-03-17T07:00:18.045727",
+  "generated_at": "2026-03-18T06:57:56.100418",
   "topics": [
     {
       "id": 217,
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2026-03-02T11:36:29.923Z",
       "like_count": 10,
       "posts_count": 2,
-      "views": 170,
+      "views": 173,
       "description": "Dear preCICE Community, tl;dr: we need the help of experienced community members in reviewing an unprecedented amount of community contributions on GitHub. If you always wanted to actively contribute, but..."
     },
     {
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@
       "last_posted_at": "2024-02-27T09:42:45.629Z",
       "like_count": 8,
       "posts_count": 4,
-      "views": 1033,
+      "views": 1034,
       "description": "The longer you wait for something, the more you appreciate it, right? preCICE v3 is finally out and we are pretty happy about it. v3.0.0 is a breaking release. This..."
     },
     {