Results not as good as those on the website

[ericyangchen]

Hi,
I recently ran the code without modifying any model settings with the dataset you provided.
However, the output results are quite blurry and most of them have quite noticeable defects on the inpainted areas ("floaters", "blurred", "empty")
It doesn't seem closed to the results displayed on the website.
I was wondering if I had done something wrong that led to this different result.
If you would like to look into this, I am happy to provide training logs and other stuff that may help solve this issue.
Thank you very much!

Below are the some of the results I obtained:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1hlN1uXp8UtGFX8FaS1ylTiGhD0Jwjz8M?usp=sharing

[weders]

Hi @ericyangchen,

From just looking at the results you provided, it seems like there is a channel flipping issue. The colors are not correct.

Can you please provide me with your environment and your logs? I will investigate afterwards.

[ericyangchen]

Sure!
Below are my envs and training logs on scene 002

env-and-logs.zip

[ericyangchen]

Below is the result I get using vis_experiment.ipynb.
The rendered images are too blurry compared to the ground truth.
Is this the expected result?
(Or I'm doing something wrong ?)

[mgpadalkar]

Below is the result I get using vis_experiment.ipynb. The rendered images are too blurry compared to the ground truth. Is this the expected result? (Or I'm doing something wrong ?)

I am facing the same issue! Can someone help? My image is as below: