Google Fonts QA

In order to host the font on Google Fonts, the fonts will have to pass our linter, [Fontbakery](https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery)

The fonts have the following issues:

## Fontbakery report

Fontbakery version: 0.6.12.dev19+g6638c122.d20190308

<details>
<summary>[2] Family checks</summary>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Check font has a license.</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/family/has_license](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/family/has_license)
* 🔥 **FAIL** No license file was found. Please add an OFL.txt or a LICENSE.txt file. If you are running fontbakery on a Google Fonts upstream repo, which is fine, just make sure there is a temporary license file in the same folder. [code: no-license]

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Check that OS/2.fsSelection bold & italic settings are unique for each NameID1</summary>

* [com.adobe.fonts/check/family/bold_italic_unique_for_nameid1](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/os2.html#com.adobe.fonts/check/family/bold_italic_unique_for_nameid1)
* 🔥 **FAIL** Family 'Gold' has 2 fonts (should be no more than 1) with the same OS/2.fsSelection bold & italic settings: Bold=False, Italic=False

</details>
 
</details>
<details>
<summary>[17] Gold-Bold.ttf</summary>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Checking OS/2 fsType.</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/fstype](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/fstype)
* 🔥 **FAIL** OS/2 fsType is a legacy DRM-related field.
In this font it is set to 8 meaning that:
The font may be embedded but must only be installed temporarily on other systems.
No such DRM restrictions can be enabled on the Google Fonts collection, so the fsType field must be set to zero (Installable Embedding) instead.
Fonts with this setting indicate that they may be embedded and permanently installed on the remote system by an application.

 More detailed info is available at:
 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/os2#fstype

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Substitute copyright, registered and trademark symbols in name table entries.</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/name/unwanted_chars](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/name/unwanted_chars)
* 🔥 **FAIL** NAMEID #0 contains symbol that should be replaced by '(c)'.
* 🔥 **FAIL** NAMEID #0 contains symbol that should be replaced by '(c)'.

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: License URL matches License text on name table?</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/name/license_url](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/name/license_url)
* 🔥 **FAIL** A known license URL must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE INFO URL) entry. Currently accepted licenses are Apache: 'http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0' or Open Font License: 'http://scripts.sil.org/OFL'
 For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License 'https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/font-licence' may be acceptable as well.
When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects. [code: no-license-found]

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Are there non-ASCII characters in ASCII-only NAME table entries?</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/name/ascii_only_entries](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/name/ascii_only_entries)
* 🔥 **FAIL** There are 2 strings containing non-ASCII characters in the ASCII-only NAME table entries.

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Copyright notices match canonical pattern in fonts</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/font_copyright](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/font_copyright)
* 🔥 **FAIL** Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: 'Copyright 2017 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)'
But instead we have got: 'Copyright © 2018 by jaiki. All rights reserved.'
* 🔥 **FAIL** Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: 'Copyright 2017 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)'
But instead we have got: 'Copyright © 2018 by jaiki. All rights reserved.'

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Checking OS/2 fsSelection value.</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/fsselection](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/fsselection)
* 🔥 **FAIL** OS/2 fsSelection REGULAR bit should be reset. [code: bad-REGULAR]
* 🔥 **FAIL** OS/2 fsSelection BOLD bit should be set. [code: bad-BOLD]

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Checking head.macStyle value.</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/mac_style](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/mac_style)
* 🔥 **FAIL** head macStyle BOLD bit should be set. [code: bad-BOLD]

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Check name table: FONT_FAMILY_NAME entries. </summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/name/familyname](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/name/familyname)
* 🔥 **FAIL** Entry [FONT_FAMILY_NAME(1):WINDOWS(3)] on the 'name' table: Expected 'Gold' but got 'Gold Bold'.

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Check name table: FONT_SUBFAMILY_NAME entries. </summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/name/subfamilyname](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/name/subfamilyname)
* 🔥 **FAIL** SUBFAMILY_NAME for Mac "Bold" must be "Regular" [code: bad-familyname]

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Check name table: TYPOGRAPHIC_FAMILY_NAME entries. </summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/name/typographicfamilyname](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/name/typographicfamilyname)
* 🔥 **FAIL** Font style is 'Bold' and, for that reason, it is not expected to have a [TYPOGRAPHIC_FAMILY_NAME(16):WINDOWS(3)] entry! [code: ribbi]

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Check name table: TYPOGRAPHIC_SUBFAMILY_NAME entries. </summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/name/typographicsubfamilyname](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/name/typographicsubfamilyname)
* 🔥 **FAIL** TYPOGRAPHIC_SUBFAMILY_NAME entry for Win "Bold" must be "Regular". Please note, since the font style is RIBBI, this record can be safely deleted.

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: PPEM must be an integer on hinted fonts.</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/integer_ppem_if_hinted](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/integer_ppem_if_hinted)
* 🔥 **FAIL** This is a hinted font, so it must have bit 3 set on the flags of the head table, so that PPEM values will be rounded into and integer value.

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Checking OS/2 usWinAscent & usWinDescent.</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/family/win_ascent_and_descent](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/universal.html#com.google.fonts/check/family/win_ascent_and_descent)
* 🔥 **FAIL** OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1084, but got 956 instead [code: ascent]
* 🔥 **FAIL** OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 680, but got 244 instead [code: descent]

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Checking OS/2 Metrics match hhea Metrics.</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/os2_metrics_match_hhea](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/universal.html#com.google.fonts/check/os2_metrics_match_hhea)
* 🔥 **FAIL** OS/2 sTypoAscender and hhea ascent must be equal. [code: ascender]

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Glyph names are all valid?</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/valid_glyphnames](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/universal.html#com.google.fonts/check/valid_glyphnames)
* 🔥 **FAIL** The following glyph names do not comply with naming conventions: nonmarkingreturn#1

 A glyph name may be up to 31 characters in length, must be entirely comprised of characters from the following set: A-Z a-z 0-9 .(period) _(underscore). and must not start with a digit or period. There are a few exceptions such as the special character ".notdef". The glyph names "twocents", "a1", and "_" are all valid, while "2cents" and ".twocents" are not.

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Font contains unique glyph names?</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/unique_glyphnames](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/universal.html#com.google.fonts/check/unique_glyphnames)
* 🔥 **FAIL** The following glyph names occur twice: ['nonmarkingreturn']

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Name table entries should not contain line-breaks.</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/name/line_breaks](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/name.html#com.google.fonts/check/name/line_breaks)
* 🔥 **FAIL** Name entry LICENSE_DESCRIPTION on platform MACINTOSH contains a line-break.
* 🔥 **FAIL** Name entry LICENSE_DESCRIPTION on platform WINDOWS contains a line-break.

</details>
 
</details>
<details>
<summary>[11] Gold-Regular.ttf</summary>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Checking OS/2 fsType.</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/fstype](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/fstype)
* 🔥 **FAIL** OS/2 fsType is a legacy DRM-related field.
In this font it is set to 8 meaning that:
The font may be embedded but must only be installed temporarily on other systems.
No such DRM restrictions can be enabled on the Google Fonts collection, so the fsType field must be set to zero (Installable Embedding) instead.
Fonts with this setting indicate that they may be embedded and permanently installed on the remote system by an application.

 More detailed info is available at:
 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/os2#fstype

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Substitute copyright, registered and trademark symbols in name table entries.</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/name/unwanted_chars](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/name/unwanted_chars)
* 🔥 **FAIL** NAMEID #0 contains symbol that should be replaced by '(c)'.
* 🔥 **FAIL** NAMEID #0 contains symbol that should be replaced by '(c)'.

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: License URL matches License text on name table?</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/name/license_url](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/name/license_url)
* 🔥 **FAIL** A known license URL must be provided in the NameID 14 (LICENSE INFO URL) entry. Currently accepted licenses are Apache: 'http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0' or Open Font License: 'http://scripts.sil.org/OFL'
 For a small set of legacy families the Ubuntu Font License 'https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/font-licence' may be acceptable as well.
When in doubt, please choose OFL for new font projects. [code: no-license-found]

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Are there non-ASCII characters in ASCII-only NAME table entries?</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/name/ascii_only_entries](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/name/ascii_only_entries)
* 🔥 **FAIL** There are 2 strings containing non-ASCII characters in the ASCII-only NAME table entries.

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Copyright notices match canonical pattern in fonts</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/font_copyright](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/font_copyright)
* 🔥 **FAIL** Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: 'Copyright 2017 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)'
But instead we have got: 'Copyright © 2018 by jaiki. All rights reserved.'
* 🔥 **FAIL** Name Table entry: Copyright notices should match a pattern similar to: 'Copyright 2017 The Familyname Project Authors (git url)'
But instead we have got: 'Copyright © 2018 by jaiki. All rights reserved.'

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: PPEM must be an integer on hinted fonts.</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/integer_ppem_if_hinted](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/googlefonts.html#com.google.fonts/check/integer_ppem_if_hinted)
* 🔥 **FAIL** This is a hinted font, so it must have bit 3 set on the flags of the head table, so that PPEM values will be rounded into and integer value.

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Checking OS/2 usWinAscent & usWinDescent.</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/family/win_ascent_and_descent](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/universal.html#com.google.fonts/check/family/win_ascent_and_descent)
* 🔥 **FAIL** OS/2.usWinAscent value should be equal or greater than 1084, but got 956 instead [code: ascent]
* 🔥 **FAIL** OS/2.usWinDescent value should be equal or greater than 680, but got 244 instead [code: descent]

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Checking OS/2 Metrics match hhea Metrics.</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/os2_metrics_match_hhea](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/universal.html#com.google.fonts/check/os2_metrics_match_hhea)
* 🔥 **FAIL** OS/2 sTypoAscender and hhea ascent must be equal. [code: ascender]

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Glyph names are all valid?</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/valid_glyphnames](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/universal.html#com.google.fonts/check/valid_glyphnames)
* 🔥 **FAIL** The following glyph names do not comply with naming conventions: nonmarkingreturn#1

 A glyph name may be up to 31 characters in length, must be entirely comprised of characters from the following set: A-Z a-z 0-9 .(period) _(underscore). and must not start with a digit or period. There are a few exceptions such as the special character ".notdef". The glyph names "twocents", "a1", and "_" are all valid, while "2cents" and ".twocents" are not.

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Font contains unique glyph names?</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/unique_glyphnames](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/universal.html#com.google.fonts/check/unique_glyphnames)
* 🔥 **FAIL** The following glyph names occur twice: ['nonmarkingreturn']

</details>
<details>
<summary>🔥 FAIL: Name table entries should not contain line-breaks.</summary>

* [com.google.fonts/check/name/line_breaks](https://font-bakery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fontbakery/profiles/name.html#com.google.fonts/check/name/line_breaks)
* 🔥 **FAIL** Name entry LICENSE_DESCRIPTION on platform MACINTOSH contains a line-break.
* 🔥 **FAIL** Name entry LICENSE_DESCRIPTION on platform WINDOWS contains a line-break.

</details>
 
</details>

### Summary

| 💔 ERROR | 🔥 FAIL | ⚠ WARN | 💤 SKIP | ℹ INFO | 🍞 PASS |
|:-----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|:----:|
| 0 | 30 | 12 | 119 | 13 | 111 |
| 0% | 11% | 4% | 42% | 5% | 39% |

**Note:** The following loglevels were omitted in this report:
* **WARN**
* **SKIP**
* **INFO**
* **PASS**

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Google Fonts QA #1

Fontbakery report

Summary

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Google Fonts QA #1

Description

Fontbakery report

Summary

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions