[Feature]: Is there a plan to support motion/react?

[busy-dog]

I suggest adding support for motion/react in Lynx. While Lynx already offers basic motion capabilities, integrating motion/react could provide a more flexible and elegant solution for complex animations. Here’s why it would be a great fit:

React Integration: Built specifically for React, it would integrate naturally into Lynx/React projects.

Advanced Features: motion/react offers more animation options, like gestures and physics-based effects, allowing for smoother and more declarative animations.

Community & Resources: Widely used within the React community, it comes with extensive support, tutorials, and examples.

In short, adding motion/react would offer more powerful functionality and flexibility while maintaining a clean, declarative approach that aligns well with Lynx's design.

[mimiqkz]

I think I've seen an example of using motion in Lynx somewhere

[tonyfromundefined]

#3191

I tried it. However, 120-frame animation doesn't work well in JS, so it's not very meaningful. Since the internal implementation of motion relies heavily on the DOM and Web Animation APIs, it might be better to create a target for react-spring.

https://react-spring.dev/docs/concepts/targets