Replies: 5 comments 6 replies
-
We can't create a repo named like that, but |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
|
+1 binding for creating |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
|
+1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
+1, for @tisonkun's idea of |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
+1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi folks,
As discussed in #6617,
we’d like to start a vote to split out
ofs(currently under[bin/ofs](https://github.com/apache/opendal/tree/main/bin/ofs))into its own experimental repository under the Apache organization (As a sub-project of Apache OpenDAL).
TL;DR
ofshas been an experiment inside the main repo for a while.It’s built on top of OpenDAL, but it’s not following the same model.
We expect it to explore some different ideas around file systems —
and that’s perfectly fine as part of our umbrella organization.
By moving it out:
Proposal
apache/ofs;Note
As part of this split, the related assets under the
integrationsdirectory —specifically
cloud_filterandfuse3— will also be migrated into the new repository.This helps to separate concerns and maintain a cleaner project structure.
Vote options
ofsas a standalone experimental repoVoting period: 72 hours from now.
If this passes, we’ll proceed with the repo setup and migration.
Thanks everyone for the discussion and support!
—
Proposed by: PsiACE
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions