Replies: 1 comment 13 replies
-
|
Can you share the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
13 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Topic
Cisco BE7000M (UCS C240) sensor is unable to reach the manager or join the grid on Security Onion 2.4.201, while identical configuration works on Dell hardware.
Background
I’m looking for guidance or confirmation from the community/maintainers regarding Cisco BE7000M (UCS C240) hardware compatibility with Security Onion 2.4.x, specifically in a sensor role.
In our environment, a BE7000M sensor was previously operational prior to 2.4.190, but since upgrading and later performing a clean install, the sensor is no longer able to communicate with the manager.
Environment
Security Onion Version: 2.4.201
Deployment Type: Distributed (Manager + Sensors)
Network: Air-gapped
Manager: Standard x86 server
Working Sensor Hardware: Dell PowerEdge R430
Non-Working Sensor Hardware: Cisco BE7000M (UCS C240)
NICs on BE7000M:
enp6s0f1
enp6s0f2
(both interfaces are UP)
Observed Behavior
Dell PowerEdge R430 (working sensor)
Can ping the manager
Successfully joins the manager
sobridge appears under ip addr
Sensor functions normally in SOC
Cisco BE7000M (non-working sensor)
Cannot ping the manager
All network connectivity tests result in 100% packet loss / no response
Sensor never joins the manager
sobridge interface is missing from ip addr
ip route get reports:
Correct interface
Correct source IP
Source IP exactly matches what is configured under:
SOC → Administration → Configuration → Firewall → Sensor
Network Test Results (BE7000M)
All of the following result in no response / 100% packet loss:
ping
ping -I enp6s0f1
ping -I enp6s0f2
TCP connectivity tests to required ports (443, 4505, 4506, 8220)
Despite this, routing appears correct at the OS level.
Troubleshooting Performed
Verified routing with ip route get
Verified both NICs are UP
Confirmed sensor IP is present in SOC firewall sensor hostgroup
Verified Salt functionality on manager and working sensor
Attempted NetworkManager adjustments (managed interfaces, route metrics)
Tested interface-specific connectivity
Tested both:
Upgrade path: 2.4.200 → 2.4.201
Fresh install of 2.4.201
Direct comparison against a Dell R430 sensor in the same architecture
Key Questions for the Community
Are there any known considerations or limitations when using Cisco UCS / BE7000M hardware as sensors in Security Onion 2.4.x?
Has anyone successfully deployed 2.4.200+ sensors on Cisco UCS / BE platforms?
Are there known issues related to:
Cisco VIC / UCS NIC drivers
Offload behavior
Fabric or kernel networking behavior
that could prevent sobridge creation or L3 connectivity?
At this time, I have not found documentation or existing GitHub issues indicating that BE7000M hardware is unsupported.
Additional Notes
The behavior appears hardware-specific
The BE7000M sensor worked prior to 2.4.190
The environment is air-gapped
I can provide masked command outputs or logs if requested
Goal of This Discussion
I’m trying to determine whether this is:
a known hardware compatibility issue,
a UCS-specific networking consideration,
or something else I should be configuring differently on this platform.
Any insight or confirmation from maintainers or others running UCS hardware would be greatly appreciated.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions