Skip to content

Maybe merge tracks #450

@tncowart

Description

@tncowart

Adds Enhancer / Promoter, Repressor, and Squelcher tracks

Screenshot 2024-11-19 at 12 04 37 PM

Besides that, I think there is quite a bit of redundancy in the tracks, which might create some confusion and also have difficulty scaling as we add more data / expand the search. I understand each source is independent in the portal, even if they represent the same candidate regulatory element. Also the same elements might show up multiple times in the same track, like in the screenshot, if significantly linked to more than one target. I think this shows the limits of the genome browser visualizations, which creates "long" views of the results if wanting to show all connections.
I'm fine with that for now, but I would prefer to include the elements in the "Tested" tracks into the "Candidate" tracks, perhaps in grey to separate them to the sig. hits. That way you can reduce the number of tracks, which should help simplifying the view.

Originally posted by @alexbarrera in #441 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions