Skip to content

More detailed tests for atom definitions #90

@hartytp

Description

@hartytp

Writing the tests, I was surprised how many small typos I found in the atomic structure data. Just silly things like an exponent missing in a transition frequency. It feels like there is still some data in this package which no one has ever used for a calculation. We should probably aim for every property of every atom to be tested in some way (e.g. transition frequencies can be compared by checking saturation intensity calculations). These don't all need to be ultra-precise - even just ruling out gross mistakes is quite useful.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions