Missing P2_PETD Viewpoint for definition of Physical Exchange Type #123
Closed
jtaeubrich
started this conversation in
Viewpoint
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Issue created for VP implementation #124 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently the SAF provides Physical Context Exchange, Physical Internal Exchange and Physical Logical Item Mapping Viewpoints that may use Physical Exchange Types to type item flows and to model their relationship to domain items. Unfortunately there is no view point to define these elements. Based on the definition of the F2_SDIK the Physical Domain should provide an P2_PETD viewpoint to support definition of Physical Exchange Types, their properties and their relationships. Such a viewpoint would support the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 Design Definition Process.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions