Replies: 1 comment
-
|
hi @jonquet - thansk for the heads up on this. This is a good point. I think we are going with the option of deriving from dcat:Resource (even though we will still use the distribution property, so by reasoning, mod:SemanticArtefact will be a dcat:Dataset) so this should be OK |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Since MOD 1.4 Schema.org (SDO) has added the notion of DefinedTerm and DefinedTermSet (another word for semantic artefact I believe).
We are going to need to review the metadata properties of this object.
Things inherited from CreativeWork and Thing were already integrated in MOD1.4 which assume an ontology was a sdo:Dataset
Note with respect to #34 => we might have a conflict when aligning our DCAT MOD2 approach with Schema.org.
@agbeltran : DCAT3 is aligned to sdo:DataSet and if we decide a mod:SemanticAretfact is a dcat:Dataset we are going to have an issue of alignement with Schema.org in which the relevant class is now sdo:DefinedTermSet which is disjoint from sdo:Dataset
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions