[Metadata] SK.LANS channel naming

[pevans-gfz]

Here there are only SP epochs included, but there is a BB sensor installed too (and hence the station is not listed in the _ADARRAY)
http://geofon.gfz-potsdam.de/fdsnws/station/1/query/?net=SK&station=LANS&channel=???&level=response

[pevans-gfz]

From https://geofon.gfz.de/fdsnws/station/1/query?level=station&format=text&network=SK&station=LANS at station level, I see this station has six channels, EH* (from 2010 to 2021) and HH* (from 2021 to today) with a sensor change from LE-3D to MBB2 change on 2021-04-15.

#Network|Station|Location|Channel|Latitude|Longitude|Elevation|Depth|Azimuth|Dip|SensorDescription|Scale|ScaleFreq|ScaleUnits|SampleRate|StartTime|EndTime
SK|LANS||EHE|49.1505|19.4678|710.0|0.0|90.0|0.0|GFZ:SK1980:LE-3D/1/g=400|640000000.0|1.0|M/S|100.0|2010-03-15T00:00:00|2021-04-15T00:00:00
SK|LANS||EHN|49.1505|19.4678|710.0|0.0|0.0|0.0|GFZ:SK1980:LE-3D/1/g=400|640000000.0|1.0|M/S|100.0|2010-03-15T00:00:00|2021-04-15T00:00:00
SK|LANS||EHZ|49.1505|19.4678|710.0|0.0|0.0|-90.0|GFZ:SK1980:LE-3D/1/g=400|640000000.0|1.0|M/S|100.0|2010-03-15T00:00:00|2021-04-15T00:00:00
SK|LANS||HHE|49.1505|19.4678|710.0|0.0|90.0|0.0|MBB2/g=1500|81967213500.0|1.0|M/S|100.0|2021-04-15T00:00:00|
SK|LANS||HHN|49.1505|19.4678|710.0|0.0|0.0|0.0|MBB2/g=1500|81967213500.0|1.0|M/S|100.0|2021-04-15T00:00:00|
SK|LANS||HHZ|49.1505|19.4678|710.0|0.0|0.0|-90.0|MBB2/g=1500|81967213500.0|1.0|M/S|100.0|2021-04-15T00:00:00|

We will need to contact the station operator to see if additional channels are available.

[andres-h]

From https://geofon.gfz.de/fdsnws/station/1/query?level=station&format=text&network=SK&station=LANS at station level, I see this station has six channels, EH* (from 2010 to 2021) and HH* (from 2021 to today) with a sensor change from LE-3D to MBB2 change on 2021-04-15.

This is correct. The station is listed in _ADARRAY:

http://geofon.gfz-potsdam.de/eidaws/routing/1/query?net=_ADARRAY&sta=LANS&format=post

So unless I misunderstood something, the problem seems to be solved.

[petrrr]

Not sure if there is really any issue here, but the epoch history for the stations looks reasonable and there should be no issue for the Vnet here.

Is this report valid?